The HiveWiki Dictionary - Definitions: Wiki:
(wih-kee) (n.) 1. Flexible website alternative to blogs!
2. Collaborative, fun to develop, community-oriented website.
(v.) 3. To easily create a website without knowing HTML.
(do it!) 4. Go Here To Create New No-Cost Hive Wiki Today!
Home | Edit | Index | Recent Changes
Learn about the Jury System at this wiki for jury members.
Today's Special Topic For Juries
Search for Jury Nullification
- Citizen's Rule Book & Jury Nullification - Citizen's Rule Book & Jury Nullification atheism.about.com Mama
- Jury nullification- Empowering the jury as the fourth branch of government
Empowering the jury as the fourth branch of government:
- Jury Nullification: What lawyers and judges won't tell you about ... - In fact, the power of jury nullification predates our Constitution. In November of 1734, a printer named John Peter Zenger was arrested for ... emporium.turnpike.net Mama
- Jury Nullification - To find out more about jury nullification and FIJA call 800-TEL-JURY and record your name and address. Or call FIJA National at (406) 793-5550. www.greenmac.com Mama
- No Title. - Visit the link for details. atheism.about.com Mama
- Fully Informed Jury Association - Great Jury Rights Day News Clip on [YouTube]Create?! (News) 4: Excellent Article on Juror Nullification as Monkeywrenching (News) 5: Nullification: ... www.fija.org Mama
- Jury Nullification and the Rule of Law - "Jury nullification" means that a jury finds a defendant innocent because the law itself is unjust, or is unjust in a particular application, ... www.friesian.com Mama
- Psychics vs. Catholics - Psychics vs. Catholics atheism.about.com Mama
- FOXNews.com - Justice Often Served By Jury Nullification - Blog | ... - Straight Talk: Justice Often Served By Jury Nullification, When the law is wrong, a jury is entitled to take the law into its own hands. www.foxnews.com Mama
- Jury Nullification: History, questions and answers about ... - Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict of "Not Guilty" despite its belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged. www.law.umkc.edu Mama
- Jury Nullification- The Evolution of a Doctrine
The Evolution of a Doctrine:
- Book by Clay Conrad and Clay S. Conrad.
- Jury Nullification - Rules of Criminal Procedure 23 (b). In other words, the judge can remove a juror if there is evidence that the juror is practicing "Jury ... www.november.org Mama
- Injustice In Georgia: The Case of Genarlow Wilson - Injustice In Georgia: The Case of Genarlow Wilson uspolitics.about.com Mama
- County Official: Citizens Subject Only to God - County Official: Citizens Subject Only to God atheism.about.com Mama
- The Democracy Defined Website. The Campaign for Restoration & Universal ... - ... Educational Campaign for RESTORATION of Jury Nullification of unjust law: genuine Trial by ... A DEMOCRACY OR IS YOUR GOVERNMENT A DESPOTISM ? JURY NULLIFICATION: WHY IS THE CITIZEN ... www.democracydefined.org Mama
- Black Representative Accosted by DC Police for Changing Hairstyle - Black Representative Accosted by DC Police for Changing Hairstyle civilliberty.about.com Mama
- Lone Star Fully Informed Jury Assoc jury duty, nullification - Jury duty preparation. Jury nullification, power, rights ... Jury nullification is an important way to inform governmental ... www.juryduty.org Mama
- Jury nullification - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - Jury nullification From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump ... article or discuss the issue on the talk page . Jury nullification refers to a rendering of a verdict by a trial jury , ... en.wikipedia.org Mama
- No Title. - #echo var= atheism.about.com Mama
- Jury Nullification Volume I- Featuring a Reprint of Lysander Spooner's Classic Work; An Essay on the Trial By Jury (1852) Plus Two 20th Century Essays
Featuring a Reprint of Lysander Spooner's Classic Work; An Essay on the Trial By Jury (1852) Plus Two 20th Century Essays:
- Book by Mike (Compiled By.) Timko.
- Jury Nullification - This section of "The American Jury" offers background and resources on jury nullification- what it is, how and when it occurs, and why it ... www.crfc.org Mama
- ISIL -- A History of Jury Nullification - Intellectual Resources A History of Jury Nullification The International Society for ... work A History of Jury Nullification A HISTORY OF JURY NULLIFICATION "If a juror accepts as ... www.isil.org Mama
- Archbishop: Homosexuality is Gross - Archbishop: Homosexuality is Gross atheism.about.com Mama
- Jurors and jury nullification - jury nullification in Canada juror.ca Mama
- Erowid Freedom Vault : Jury Nullification - Information about jury rights, the jury nullification movement, current cases, media coverage, ... psychoactive plants and chemicals. Jury Rights & Jury Nullification Amendment VI of the ... www.erowid.org Mama
- Is Torture Justified - Discussion of Whether Torture is Ever Justified - Is torture justified? It isn't necessarily an easy question. civilliberty.about.com Mama
Empowering the jury as the fourth branch of government:
Book by William Goodloe. Fully Informed Jury Association 24 pages Unknown Binding Published 1996.
The Evolution of a Doctrine:
Book by Clay Conrad and Clay S. Conrad. Carolina Academic Press 311 pages Paperback Description: Juries have been delivering independent verdicts in the interest of justice for over 800 years, and many legal historians and scholars believe the value of juries is their power to act as the "conscience of the community," serving as the final check and balance on government in the moment of truth. If juries are nothing more than rubber stamps, they are no limit on government's power to pass unjust, immoral, or oppressive laws, and citizens are entirely at the mercy of sometimes jaded or corrupt courts and legislatures. This was what the Founding Fathers feared, and this is the reason why they guaranteed trial by jury three times in the Constitution -- more than any other right. In Jury Nullification, author Clay Conrad examines the history, the law, and the practical and political implications of jury independence, examining in depth the role of nullification in capital punishment law, the dark side of jury nullification in Southern lynching and civil rights cases, and the purpose and legal effect of the juror's oath. The book concludes with an examination of what trial lawyers can do when nullification is the best available defense. This book should be of interest to historians, trial lawyers, criminologists, political scientists, and anyone interested in knowing how our criminal justice system works -- and how to make it better.
- Review:: 'You must read this book!! Just before a jury retires to deliberate in a criminal case, the judge tells the jurors that they "must follow the law--even if they do not agree with it." This book shows that such an instruction is very misleading. A ton of evidence is presented to show that juries are supposed to "check" the government by returning "not guilty" verdicts whenever they conclude that the person on trial is being treated unjustly. Our second president, John Adams, said "it is not only the juror's right, but his duty, to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, even though in direct opposition to the direction of the judge."
These days judges influence the outcome of trials by counting on the average citizen's ignorance and by "excusing" any citizen who knows about the doctrine of jury nullification. Interestingly, a single vote can make a big difference. Because a unanimous vote is necessary for a conviction, a single juror who votes his or her conscience (and withstands the peer pressure to go along with the others) can obtain a hung jury. The person on trial may be retried again, but prosecutors will surely think twice about the matter before expending more time and money on the case. The author explains how jury nullification got a bad wrap and convincingly answers the common objections. I was surprised to learn that defense attorneys can be punished for mentioning seemingly important pieces of information at trial. For example, if someone used marijuana to relieve nausea stemming from AIDS, the judge typically "bars" any mention of the person's illness as "irrelevent." The jury never hears about it. That does not sound like a "trial by jury" to me
- Review:: 'About Time! With the growth of interest in juries since the OJ and Kevorkian cases, it is about time that someone wrote a truly well-researched work on how juries actually work, and why. This work is long overdue. Conrad does an excellent job in developing the history of the criminal jury, and explains why criminal juries have the "prerogative" of nullifing laws that are unjust or unjustly applied.
Whether liberal, libertarian or conservative, it is hard to argue that juries have to follow the law no matter how unjust the law is. Now, there is a well-researched and well documented book explaining how and why the jury's nullification power became a part of American law. It is about time.
- Review:: 'Jury discretion: no scarier than prosecutorial discretion A fascinating study of the often-ignored history of jury nullification in America. Today we mostly think of this phenomenon in the context of the O.J. Simpson trial, or the juries that refused to convict racist killers in the South during the Civil Rights era. As the author points out, that's a small part of the jury nullification picture. The Framers considered such injustices well worth it in light of the jury's ability to frustrate the actions of would-be tyrants. Such discretion on the part of juries has its downside, of course -- but so does the unbridled discretion of prosecutors, which is generally considered to be a Good Thing by many of those who fear giving the same discretion to juries. As Conrad makes clear, it's not obvious why this should be the case.
- Review:: 'A Most Excellent Book Conrad's book is superb! He examines the history of the right of "jury nullification" or "jury independence" (the right and obligation of jurors to judge the LAW, as well as the FACTS in any case). Like most people, I knew relatively little about this right, which today is usually never mentioned to actual sitting jurors. Conrad traces the history of the use of this right, which was well known and legally recognized until very recently by the courts. Part of English common law, it was used extensively from the 1200's until the 1930's. From "seditious libel against the crown", to the slavery issue, to Prohibition, Jury Nullification was used to acquit defendants whenever the jury felt that the specific law was unjust or the penalty was grossly unfair. Thus, jurors had the right and obligation to judge the LAW and the case FACTS in order to render justice - regardless of any instructions from the presiding judge and the courts. This is a remarkable book, easy to read and filled with interesting facts that every American should know. I recommend it highly.
- Review:: 'excellent review of a "top secret" constitutional right Many have heard how juries bravely refused to convict people accused of assisting runaway slaves in the 19th century but few know the full history of jury nullification. Clay Conrad aims to remedy that ignorance in this excellent book from the Cato Institute. Starting with cases from hundreds of years ago, the history of jury powers is meticulously detailed with all the major episodes covered including recent events such as the Laura Kriho conviction. Jury independence is shown time and again to have been on the right side of issues such as slavery, prohibition, the labor movement and draft resistance. The modern jury power movement is also examined.
This isn't just a history book, though. The author looks at constitutional issues, studies of jury behavior, and also addresses many of the criticisms of jury power. The most widely repeated criticism is that jury nullification was largely responsible for the lack of convictions in the South of whites committing crimes against blacks. Conrad makes a strong case that it was racist judges, police and prosecutors as well as the practice of preventing blacks from serving on juries that resulted in so few convictions. The book is rounded out with a chapter full of interesting tactics on how lawyers can introduce nullification arguments in court.
Cached copy until 11:04:22 AM 362 hits
|
|